The Tetrahedron of Will

This page is under repair.(6-8-26)

1/18/07:   Hit and Run Gang  seems to be my earliest use of the Tetrahedron of Will

Now I must (thanks to Meta or other AI) reference others who used it. See previous post. 

Arthur Young. Abraham Maslow.

*Maslow, I knew before the geometric projection.  Arthur Young,after the development of my tetrahedron. 

Already credited Einstein and Plato.   

Must add: Kant, Hegel, Hume, Mill. 

R. Buckminster Fuller.  (In this case a belated credit but right after Plato.   

The Republic I represented in a book report in Junior High. And in High School I attended an assembly with R. Buckminster Fuller, the guest.

*Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: a triangle.

 

5/16/26

Another name and categorical is Emerson and the Existentialists and Romantics.  

Politics is (~)football by other means.

Sports is a fertile field for narrative.  Just look at this weekend; the Brady/Manning matchup in the AFC and the Palmer/Newton NFC match up.  Will it be age before Heisman? 

Speaking of Clause Wits[!] *

* not fully read (or viewed football)yet
of / or 
Clause Wits (3.0)?
\
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?

[Hume or  ...(~)]
(~)  "the continuation"
"War is the continuation** of politics by other means."
** Relative Exceptionalism

All Blank are not created equally.

Under 4eh[!]

OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal".  Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything. 
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.

Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy. 

https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*

http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/

*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.

[  http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]

An  Inconvenient Truth ?

Or unweaving of a quilt?

[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism. 

The Square Root of

[" i. "]

This ... is not being facetious or Freudian.  But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*




BTW:  NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive








Co-wink Key-dink ?  D'oh!




(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)

1.  the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2.  Chesterton on importance of fables
3.  ditto
4.  semantic (bs)/bs
5.  Mobius
Notational  Segway [!] *



*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you

Heck Oven(~)

[Truman's] Indictment.

Colbert's Ire Ron Knee [!] ?

Hume or...* Letterman? [~]

* (5-8-15) links need work

Close Encounters of the...

what kind ?

BTW:  The QCON label has been little used of L8, I wonder if it too a fork at Hume or...Tan gent.

Relemma'n Leo

Facebook :  Image



Credit



 

 

 

( Belated Credit Not THE Original Source [?] )

De-Hegelian~Geometrics?
Plato, Hegel, Hume or Wittgenstein
Betrand Russell  /  ? Thank Dog ~I have~ a hard copy[!]

(2-18-15) (F'n P! or ER?) [Neo-jugate or Neo-sophist ? ?  Re:O]
(:~:) Strauss B. Told[!]
 

Satire is not a two way street.

That is the proposal.  That it is unlikely to be possible for there to be equivalence on the right and left.  Now that is an awkward statement or phrasing of the* obvious. 

There is difficulty comparing anything at opposite ends of the political spectrum, let alone** middles.  The Olbermann/Beck comparison is along the lines of journalism more than parody.  Limbaugh along the lines of Colbert more than Olbermann.  It may be along the lines of who is pulling whose leg for whom.  That's the gravitas!

To paraphrase the difficulty for which there is more work needed, parody may be more difficult for those in power. But this may confuse parody with satire, or either with having a point, confounded by the(~)irony of being direct about the point in a world of hypocrisy.

(FP1)
(awkward): A. "Comedian Rush Limbaugh", B. Whatcha gonna do about it?  

*12-29-14 (of the): A. Para-model, b. ..., c. ..., d. ..., e. ... ,  f. ... ,  g. ...   h. BtU  , I. What the Beck? , j. ... , k., (l.)  ..., (m.) ... (note font size A. & I. = Normal Ctrl F "of the left")
** or muddle is the hume or...(FP!)
( comparison) : A. The Billy Club..., B.Genre Clash, C.  
(gravitas): A. 4Mat, B. Way, Too Point Oh?, C. Or ask for a third, D. Funneling Crisis?
ticket: A. Hump Day?, B.  The New Compendium, C. Primary Boogeyman, D. Not to make light..., (...)  R. Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? ... (...)

(FP!) It is important to note that I have barely finished processing much of what I have included above @ ** in particular.


PaxOnBothHouses

Add caption

*** not inserted but re~spectrum 'tween *&**.

The middle is

or muddle is the hume or...




[#a- ch22-KUOW 8-8-30]
Q-bah! D-cap it all scHism.[!]

Hump Day?

To Re:view Page:
Original intent to retrace the War on Hillary[!] links.
Under RE:VIEWING we find: File for Facebook.(but that is a tangent)
So back to 12-2-14.  We find Culture*. Below that we find OW [!]
Then (FP1) parses the Greek. Under which I find a new anamoly.** [A Witt gen stein?]
Within FP! we have (FP2)
Under post-pyth we have more on Hillary.  Prior threads and Pythagorean work on the way.
That's the ticket. C. bad+press Other Greeks*** to Countdown. or un-Vienna Circle?
The Calculus of DOW or coneheads? (Jung, Euclid, Barlow), (Newton Liebniz Asimov), Dar Tan Ya?

But back to the parsing or back from the tangent.
~~~~
(FP1)
~~~~
 (Liebniz Dar Ching)
There is no plausible metaphilosophy. All is metaphysics. 
Wittgenstein/NewLieb/TOW: words, math, subjective  /* objective Larouche / Rand?

Manual Blog Search: Not Just ... a Pen Chant 4 Geo Metrics.
Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope , I.Q.* (draft) , Gitmo or less. ,
 Reading In Progress[***], Full Read! ?,  Hume or boo , F'N 3
[Need to review labeling of photos, images, cartoons etc]

Is the rational, math or language? 
Is subjective/objective the real ManyKey'nIsm or classical economics?
C-Shelley ? Or pre- stein.

*asterisk in original (* R.I.P.)
** leave as anamoly of [scroll over unclickable]
***  need to adjust way point(that's the ticket)

(FN!) : Starting with the last insert.(*-5) = mics? in regards to the meta-plausible.
(*-9)@ ManyKey'nIsm we (b.s.)Tryunism for 3 links in 2 posts.
A bit more anachronistic(*-1) we are Frank 'n pre-cast[!] 'n loosing the thread with C-Shelley ?
Or Shilling Schiller [!] 

Four Models(~):

 

(~) models : Milo Mulligan / The message is the mess.  (~) Para-model

Penta-meta point ?
Geo-metrics [!] ? (~)





 /*  : (2-4-14) [ / ]=subjective+objective:(b.s.) link inserted also two selected from(fp3)

AsIMovian Principles.

SciFi? Non-Fi?
Foundations?

Words, Math, Pictures(geometry),
Reality, subjective, objective.
4 p or 4 m / mean, rod knee, Hume, Kant

Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One)

12-1-14 The Un-Revolved(~) Thread: (bottom up-4) (C): Schiller, Schelli.ng, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*? , Kobayashi Maru, (c) What are the Frackin' Odds..., (d) One of my readers, (e) Speaking of Timing,  Canard Lines, Catching Up with US., Post-Pyth?
(V): (Vienna), Post-Pyth? (3) Ludwig Wittgenstein - Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus - Preface,

Watch Queue

TV Queue

by Roger Larson

Watch QueueTV Queue

Playlist title

Watch Queue

TV Queue

__count__/__total__

Watch Queue

TV Queue

by Roger Larson

Watch QueueTV Queue

Playlist title

Watch Queue

TV Queue

__count__/__total__

(2) "The Plausibility of Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy" - Timothy Williamson & Paul Horwich, (1) Wittgenstein
 
http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/microsite/sports?cmpid=FCST_sportslist_nfl#NFL

12-2-14 War on Hillary[!] OW ! Monkey Business Hmmm. (FP2)

12-3-14 Maybe you had to be there(FP1). [Which is actually here, see anamoly @ (3) and below when scrolling this all.)] It is likely I accidently clicked on a function or blogspot instruction, that I am unaware of. Pardon my muchado about anomaly.  The point was to review the day and reference the points, as color coded under ROY G BIV. As to more under Hillary I refer to the geometrics of the Third Way or monkey business of recent posts. I seem to have mucked ~~~~up~~~~ enough for now.  

12-4-14: ebb:War on Hillary[!], of:Hump Day?, war:WOW, (b.s.)... raven, (b.s.)[!] football  NO! Jung on the Enantiodromia!
12-5-14: to Pun on the 5th scroll / over *scheduled post*=today. Above * = yesterday. i.e. 4 FP more than the **  issue or weak[!] ~week~. (FP2)*
12-8-14: post - posted
(FP 12-9-14)
12-10-14: a. , b. , C. Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em , D. Failure is always ,  e. Go Left Young Man!, F. Slippery Slope

12-15-14:  on Saturday the 13th no post, but 15th update. 

12-29-14 (of the): A. Para-model, b. The Billy Club..., c. Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right., d. The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. THANK YOU DAVE ROSS! , f. Turning the page (On Humor)? , g. Turning the Page (2.0) h. Bush the United , I. What the Beck? , j. No Teddy , k., (l.) Unity Hits Reality, (m.) Throwing the Game (note font size A. & I. = Normal Ctrl F "of the left")
** or muddle is the hume or...
( comparison) : A. The Billy Club..., B.Genre Clash, C.
(gravitas): A. 4Mat, B. Way, Too Point Oh?, C. Or ask for a third, D. Funneling Crisis?
ticket: A. Hump Day? , B. The New Compendium , C. Primary Boogeyman , D. Not to make light... , E. Monkey Business , F. The Hope'd4 Campaign , G. ( ), H. Not to Follow-Up... , I. The other ground game... , J. What Obama can't say. , K. Checking In: , L. Two Wrongs Make a Right? , M. Churned Media , N. Republicans can't run against congress anymore. , O. Co-Op-Ed , P. Where does this fit? , Q. On any given day? , R. Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?   (...)

Reading In Progress[***]

R.I.P.?

Bill Mauer and Sam Harris are the best case for religions.[***] 
Before I exscrabble[!] my case, I note three reference points.  First to Hegellian dialect(ic), second to democracy (Churchill)and the best, and third to Voltaire's gardening and the best.  Let alone the full crumb or hinge pin of tolerance. * (neo?)

[binary references]

[!] Witt gen stein  (and I hadn't even bit on the "binary" bit or subjective/objective "heritage".) Let alone hoist on his own cable. 

*seg way D-fact-oh? ex facto[!] (paragraph 10 militance?)
(p ll clash reaction) [p12 "willy nilly"]{p14 Jell-oh}
"stacks the deck" shelter
Fn1 (original inserts R.I.P. / neo)
Fn2 (shelter / oh)**
Fn3 (crumb / hinge)
** HeGel
Fn4 “Religion is like a pair of shoes.....Find one that fits for you, but don't make me wear your shoes.”  George Carlin
FP? : A. Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality, B.(R) F'n P[!] , C. Apples and Oranges and Cherry Picking.
(R) adjustment>B
1.  Hegel, 2. Churchill, 3. Voltaire (i., ii.)
2b. C-p, 1. 2. 3. 4. What are the Frackin' Odds...
Steal [***] yourself 4 the binary.

 

 

 

 

[***] (10-9-14) NOTE: 3 placements of the triple asterisk:

Heading, Lede and Steal. (Could read *Steele*.)

 

I may nail Wittgenstein to the door Erasmus[!]  Dimentionalism and TryUnity.

Three amigoes and the sine of the cross?   Hume or Confucius? In the name of the age of consumerism to fed up.  The branches(*4) of his(s)tory[!]  Pythagorian, Platonic, Judeo, Christian, Papal, Islam... Every age has a pater and mater. We all need a John. 

 

ITALICS (here)mightB the Paul Harvey... /(Peter Rabbit)  Re:history WholeEness.

(p."Feel the Love"?   / Q   r. R not, R2, R not, R2, R2, R not. )